Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-19 07:24:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 10CE5E89079BC1298F91490D4EA934AAFE69415E5AD1CC295974361F570DB549
Participant Details

Original Note:

Security apparatus is not Saschs' field at all. He is discussing Gabbard's characteristics that do not make her qualified for a job that requires top-secret clearance: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulsi_Gabbard Also, many voice concerns about Sachs' curiously bizarre inclinations. Reader's caution is advised: https://vatniksoup.com/en/soups/166/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1869644007011201295
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 10CE5E89079BC1298F91490D4EA934AAFE69415E5AD1CC295974361F570DB549
  • createdAtMillis - 1734593057873
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 186964400701120129510CE5E89079BC1298F91490D4EA934AAFE69415E5AD1CC295974361F570DB549