Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-19 09:59:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D4406B53E4CB0E07B49DD87A6174A20CA73F8DAD4A0F6B14A82B1DFC999F8922
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. La note ne cite pas de source fiable, et exprime un parti pris très clair, non objectif (« hystérie verbale », « clairement irrespectueux »)

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1869524561709977960
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D4406B53E4CB0E07B49DD87A6174A20CA73F8DAD4A0F6B14A82B1DFC999F8922
  • createdAtMillis - 1734602348472
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1869524561709977960D4406B53E4CB0E07B49DD87A6174A20CA73F8DAD4A0F6B14A82B1DFC999F8922