Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-04 20:54:40 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 22D4E335279B6A296DBAAE1B43386D2DAA58766A63A81B7FE907A49E151EE368
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. La note ne cite pas de source fiable, et exprime un parti pris très clair, non objectif (« hystérie verbale », « clairement irrespectueux »)

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1869524561709977960
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 22D4E335279B6A296DBAAE1B43386D2DAA58766A63A81B7FE907A49E151EE368
  • createdAtMillis - 1736024080124
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 186952456170997796022D4E335279B6A296DBAAE1B43386D2DAA58766A63A81B7FE907A49E151EE368