Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-19 03:36:37 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EAFDC4A8AAE224EA4EDB22D101CF6CFFC522DB49C0F355FEE011943CECBC7C8B
Participant Details

Original Note:

I think CN contributors should be removed from program after they get a number of rejected notes. If you have a high number of rejected notes it’s an indication that you don’t know how the system works and should not be part of it. It discourages this type of behavior.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1869484085501980815
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EAFDC4A8AAE224EA4EDB22D101CF6CFFC522DB49C0F355FEE011943CECBC7C8B
  • createdAtMillis - 1734579397712
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1869484085501980815EAFDC4A8AAE224EA4EDB22D101CF6CFFC522DB49C0F355FEE011943CECBC7C8B