Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-19 00:55:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C8812099B941D99E630B24E049DB1106487AFE1965D6880FE16027146F1C4C87
Participant Details

Original Note:

I think CN contributors should be removed from program after they get a number of rejected notes. If you have a high number of rejected notes it’s an indication that you don’t know how the system works and should not be part of it. It discourages this type of behavior.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1869484085501980815
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C8812099B941D99E630B24E049DB1106487AFE1965D6880FE16027146F1C4C87
  • createdAtMillis - 1734569730456
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1869484085501980815C8812099B941D99E630B24E049DB1106487AFE1965D6880FE16027146F1C4C87