Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-18 21:33:54 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A86A3795171986FDB626A5E8B36E10FC36DD339D06E2C4E605D00CD2DA1975B7
Participant Details

Original Note:

I think CN contributors should be removed from program after they get a number of rejected notes. If you have a high number of rejected notes it’s an indication that you don’t know how the system works and should not be part of it. It discourages this type of behavior.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1869484085501980815
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A86A3795171986FDB626A5E8B36E10FC36DD339D06E2C4E605D00CD2DA1975B7
  • createdAtMillis - 1734557634973
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1869484085501980815A86A3795171986FDB626A5E8B36E10FC36DD339D06E2C4E605D00CD2DA1975B7