Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-18 23:19:52 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 322FA3512D5586FE40351F8D79A6CA4404415BB34430D0E91E3C06EBCF0069F0
Participant Details

Original Note:

I think CN contributors should be removed from program after they get a number of rejected notes. If you have a high number of rejected notes it’s an indication that you don’t know how the system works and should not be part of it. It discourages this type of behavior.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1869484085501980815
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 322FA3512D5586FE40351F8D79A6CA4404415BB34430D0E91E3C06EBCF0069F0
  • createdAtMillis - 1734563992599
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1869484085501980815322FA3512D5586FE40351F8D79A6CA4404415BB34430D0E91E3C06EBCF0069F0