Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-18 21:27:04 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 032217CDB4DB9EABBB63414587F0D5E9DF5E56A244FA86B9D9B3A9DC5C0B7CF3
Participant Details

Original Note:

I think CN contributors should be removed from program after they get a number of rejected notes. If you have a high number of rejected notes it’s an indication that you don’t know how the system works and should not be part of it. It discourages this type of behavior.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1869484085501980815
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 032217CDB4DB9EABBB63414587F0D5E9DF5E56A244FA86B9D9B3A9DC5C0B7CF3
  • createdAtMillis - 1734557224543
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1869484085501980815032217CDB4DB9EABBB63414587F0D5E9DF5E56A244FA86B9D9B3A9DC5C0B7CF3