Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-20 03:20:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4EAB1BDA5AC354768D2E4BB353C2F5B17F03C119863AD0B34B5BC69414902F34
Participant Details

Original Note:

No es un hecho aclarado, la UNAM en su comunicado dice: "El fallo judicial constituye una interferencia flagrante e inadmisible a la autonomía y la legislación universitarias". https://www.dgcs.unam.mx/boletin/bdboletin/2024_943bis.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1869417054794625307
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4EAB1BDA5AC354768D2E4BB353C2F5B17F03C119863AD0B34B5BC69414902F34
  • createdAtMillis - 1734664830169
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18694170547946253074EAB1BDA5AC354768D2E4BB353C2F5B17F03C119863AD0B34B5BC69414902F34