Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-19 03:26:59 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EDAE39136EC4F394A6F0DFDA05375A3F9FBFF453C4FE739222316B437A00C311
Participant Details

Original Note:

NIN- Even though there is no misinformation in the post, clearly from people's reactions they are getting the misconception that Arnold has aged drastically in the past few years which is not the case therefore the note is needed for providing "important context"

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1869383586484502610
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EDAE39136EC4F394A6F0DFDA05375A3F9FBFF453C4FE739222316B437A00C311
  • createdAtMillis - 1734578819778
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1869383586484502610EDAE39136EC4F394A6F0DFDA05375A3F9FBFF453C4FE739222316B437A00C311