Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-19 04:33:55 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E3009906BF21ACAF4A73ECDA8069C4FDE2F103C67371ECF3A8D6D34D24F2BD40
Participant Details

Original Note:

NIN- Even though there is no misinformation in the post, clearly from people's reactions they are getting the misconception that Arnold has aged drastically in the past few years which is not the case therefore the note is needed for providing "important context"

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1869383586484502610
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E3009906BF21ACAF4A73ECDA8069C4FDE2F103C67371ECF3A8D6D34D24F2BD40
  • createdAtMillis - 1734582835496
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1869383586484502610E3009906BF21ACAF4A73ECDA8069C4FDE2F103C67371ECF3A8D6D34D24F2BD40