Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-18 16:59:23 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AA78DA8719495D2FA8BBB215BB6E0844040D1989C34DF03AEA579EA4C11AFED5
Participant Details

Original Note:

NIN- Even though there is no misinformation in the post, clearly from people's reactions they are getting the misconception that Arnold has aged drastically in the past few years which is not the case therefore the note is needed for providing "important context"

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1869383586484502610
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AA78DA8719495D2FA8BBB215BB6E0844040D1989C34DF03AEA579EA4C11AFED5
  • createdAtMillis - 1734541163529
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1869383586484502610AA78DA8719495D2FA8BBB215BB6E0844040D1989C34DF03AEA579EA4C11AFED5