Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-19 05:45:33 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 160CDAA2A660A27E2E07C4844DFBA3715A39F76B0DF466701F77B4D42F6D9E7E
Participant Details

Original Note:

NIN- Even though there is no misinformation in the post, clearly from people's reactions they are getting the misconception that Arnold has aged drastically in the past few years which is not the case therefore the note is needed for providing "important context"

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1869383586484502610
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 160CDAA2A660A27E2E07C4844DFBA3715A39F76B0DF466701F77B4D42F6D9E7E
  • createdAtMillis - 1734587133050
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1869383586484502610160CDAA2A660A27E2E07C4844DFBA3715A39F76B0DF466701F77B4D42F6D9E7E