Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-19 19:18:12 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 076D739A9C2F88B635C27DE49C896CA0A5EFEFC012D6D3C5BE4E6DFC027DC124
Participant Details

Original Note:

NIN- Even though there is no misinformation in the post, clearly from people's reactions they are getting the misconception that Arnold has aged drastically in the past few years which is not the case therefore the note is needed for providing "important context"

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1869383586484502610
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 076D739A9C2F88B635C27DE49C896CA0A5EFEFC012D6D3C5BE4E6DFC027DC124
  • createdAtMillis - 1734635892471
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1869383586484502610076D739A9C2F88B635C27DE49C896CA0A5EFEFC012D6D3C5BE4E6DFC027DC124