Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-18 13:52:15 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C3C055055DB21F3E422CF3A558E79C575C71850C9D7EAD017A837FE12CD081CD
Participant Details

Original Note:

False. Levin’s involvement began after he read the French translation in 1951, years after its 1947 Dutch publication. Forensic analysis confirmed authenticity by matching Anne’s diary handwriting with her school handwriting and dating the paper, ink, and glue to pre-1950. https://archive.org/details/diaryofannefrank0000fran_b0k1 https://www.nytimes.com/1989/06/08/books/an-authenticated-edition-of-anne-frank-s-diary.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1869309840805552481
participantId -
raterParticipantId - C3C055055DB21F3E422CF3A558E79C575C71850C9D7EAD017A837FE12CD081CD
createdAtMillis - 1734529935273
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1869309840805552481C3C055055DB21F3E422CF3A558E79C575C71850C9D7EAD017A837FE12CD081CD