Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-23 06:07:48 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9B39D7971592E56637DDB4715FD5B744D074D4746A1DC287703C38DAA69A419B
Participant Details

Original Note:

False. Levin’s involvement began after he read the French translation in 1951, years after its 1947 Dutch publication. Forensic analysis confirmed authenticity by matching Anne’s diary handwriting with her school handwriting and dating the paper, ink, and glue to pre-1950. https://archive.org/details/diaryofannefrank0000fran_b0k1 https://www.nytimes.com/1989/06/08/books/an-authenticated-edition-of-anne-frank-s-diary.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1869309840805552481
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 9B39D7971592E56637DDB4715FD5B744D074D4746A1DC287703C38DAA69A419B
createdAtMillis - 1734934068119
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 18693098408055524819B39D7971592E56637DDB4715FD5B744D074D4746A1DC287703C38DAA69A419B