Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-20 01:44:32 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E31F07A4B008E61DEDC1BCF853029F544FE248C9789F843E3EEC78725DFA2B3C
Participant Details

Original Note:

Gentili expõe o porquê da decisão judicial, q se fundamenta na imitação quando evidentemente é uma sátira. É uma opinião pessoal (justa). O vinho de Gentili é produzido por 3 humoristas. Quem compra o vinho pretensamente imitado não iria se enganar, pois caro e nichado.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1869202272116174957
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E31F07A4B008E61DEDC1BCF853029F544FE248C9789F843E3EEC78725DFA2B3C
  • createdAtMillis - 1734659072064
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1869202272116174957E31F07A4B008E61DEDC1BCF853029F544FE248C9789F843E3EEC78725DFA2B3C