Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-18 02:50:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2C2734D218AD056AEE8D4F7D235DBF4F5B999B1DB7806F9425AB0F52CC8E1461
Participant Details

Original Note:

Gentili expõe o porquê da decisão judicial, q se fundamenta na imitação quando evidentemente é uma sátira. É uma opinião pessoal (justa). O vinho de Gentili é produzido por 3 humoristas. Quem compra o vinho pretensamente imitado não iria se enganar, pois caro e nichado.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1869202272116174957
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2C2734D218AD056AEE8D4F7D235DBF4F5B999B1DB7806F9425AB0F52CC8E1461
  • createdAtMillis - 1734490255276
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18692022721161749572C2734D218AD056AEE8D4F7D235DBF4F5B999B1DB7806F9425AB0F52CC8E1461