Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-17 13:33:52 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D969CD897954590A8B803C22C47B9981A43DF442A103DF6CDFFEC8E0FB2740E6
Participant Details

Original Note:

False. The suit is in regards to the board’s decision in 2022 to publicly state that the none of NYT works was "discredited by facts that emerged subsequent to the conferral of the prizes". The judge ruled "the alleged defamatory statement to be actionable" https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24918142-trumpvpulitzersmtd/ https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24918143-trumpvpulitzersjurisdictionrlg/ https://www.pulitzer.org/news/statement-pulitzer-prize-board-2 https://www.politico.com/news/2024/07/21/trump-libel-suit-pulitzer-prize-00169975 https://x.com/ggreenwald/status/1815425312706240671 https://x.com/politico/status/986026509625446401

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1869008640738279901
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D969CD897954590A8B803C22C47B9981A43DF442A103DF6CDFFEC8E0FB2740E6
  • createdAtMillis - 1734442432796
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1869008640738279901D969CD897954590A8B803C22C47B9981A43DF442A103DF6CDFFEC8E0FB2740E6