Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-18 13:08:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B1ADB297A297E28878E013F025A7EACB3C77B63C4A9AB6AE60562A8F2ED1715D
Participant Details

Original Note:

False. The suit is in regards to the board’s decision in 2022 to publicly state that the none of NYT works was "discredited by facts that emerged subsequent to the conferral of the prizes". The judge ruled "the alleged defamatory statement to be actionable" https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24918142-trumpvpulitzersmtd/ https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24918143-trumpvpulitzersjurisdictionrlg/ https://www.pulitzer.org/news/statement-pulitzer-prize-board-2 https://www.politico.com/news/2024/07/21/trump-libel-suit-pulitzer-prize-00169975 https://x.com/ggreenwald/status/1815425312706240671 https://x.com/politico/status/986026509625446401

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1869008640738279901
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B1ADB297A297E28878E013F025A7EACB3C77B63C4A9AB6AE60562A8F2ED1715D
  • createdAtMillis - 1734527310614
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1869008640738279901B1ADB297A297E28878E013F025A7EACB3C77B63C4A9AB6AE60562A8F2ED1715D