Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-17 23:35:42 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9E272E1936D490D69379496FDA0D1F777E72ECF84B1AFBDFA8F786BADD5655EF
Participant Details

Original Note:

False. The suit is in regards to the board’s decision in 2022 to publicly state that the none of NYT works was "discredited by facts that emerged subsequent to the conferral of the prizes". The judge ruled "the alleged defamatory statement to be actionable" https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24918142-trumpvpulitzersmtd/ https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24918143-trumpvpulitzersjurisdictionrlg/ https://www.pulitzer.org/news/statement-pulitzer-prize-board-2 https://www.politico.com/news/2024/07/21/trump-libel-suit-pulitzer-prize-00169975 https://x.com/ggreenwald/status/1815425312706240671 https://x.com/politico/status/986026509625446401

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1869008640738279901
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9E272E1936D490D69379496FDA0D1F777E72ECF84B1AFBDFA8F786BADD5655EF
  • createdAtMillis - 1734478542635
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18690086407382799019E272E1936D490D69379496FDA0D1F777E72ECF84B1AFBDFA8F786BADD5655EF