Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-17 14:39:55 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 97D7D8B1853BFE28A62383B30677F7D5333DECCFB2432469122B4213999974EE
Participant Details

Original Note:

False. The suit is in regards to the board’s decision in 2022 to publicly state that the none of NYT works was "discredited by facts that emerged subsequent to the conferral of the prizes". The judge ruled "the alleged defamatory statement to be actionable" https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24918142-trumpvpulitzersmtd/ https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24918143-trumpvpulitzersjurisdictionrlg/ https://www.pulitzer.org/news/statement-pulitzer-prize-board-2 https://www.politico.com/news/2024/07/21/trump-libel-suit-pulitzer-prize-00169975 https://x.com/ggreenwald/status/1815425312706240671 https://x.com/politico/status/986026509625446401

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1869008640738279901
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 97D7D8B1853BFE28A62383B30677F7D5333DECCFB2432469122B4213999974EE
  • createdAtMillis - 1734446395543
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 186900864073827990197D7D8B1853BFE28A62383B30677F7D5333DECCFB2432469122B4213999974EE