Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-17 14:24:32 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8FE748ABBB921D26198646C4CE76CE3B8E704ED9606C6A648DE740AEF89425FE
Participant Details

Original Note:

False. The suit is in regards to the board’s decision in 2022 to publicly state that the none of NYT works was "discredited by facts that emerged subsequent to the conferral of the prizes". The judge ruled "the alleged defamatory statement to be actionable" https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24918142-trumpvpulitzersmtd/ https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24918143-trumpvpulitzersjurisdictionrlg/ https://www.pulitzer.org/news/statement-pulitzer-prize-board-2 https://www.politico.com/news/2024/07/21/trump-libel-suit-pulitzer-prize-00169975 https://x.com/ggreenwald/status/1815425312706240671 https://x.com/politico/status/986026509625446401

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1869008640738279901
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8FE748ABBB921D26198646C4CE76CE3B8E704ED9606C6A648DE740AEF89425FE
  • createdAtMillis - 1734445472427
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18690086407382799018FE748ABBB921D26198646C4CE76CE3B8E704ED9606C6A648DE740AEF89425FE