Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-17 15:32:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AFDE8B257C3CF198BF6F70560F4B57D1F2D0E8FCE2570788A0139E74FF5ADFFA
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN There is nothing factually incorrect about the post. This is a dissertation about the “resilience” of pedophiles which uses a euphemism for “pedophiles.” The author of the OP has an opinion about that. They are allowed to.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1868991799567544417
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AFDE8B257C3CF198BF6F70560F4B57D1F2D0E8FCE2570788A0139E74FF5ADFFA
  • createdAtMillis - 1734449564667
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1868991799567544417AFDE8B257C3CF198BF6F70560F4B57D1F2D0E8FCE2570788A0139E74FF5ADFFA