Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-17 16:35:43 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 827EEF21BEB1D65ED54927B304CE297632423F4E6975802CDCF95B671F71A63C
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN There is nothing factually incorrect about the post. This is a dissertation about the “resilience” of pedophiles which uses a euphemism for “pedophiles.” The author of the OP has an opinion about that. They are allowed to.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1868991799567544417
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 827EEF21BEB1D65ED54927B304CE297632423F4E6975802CDCF95B671F71A63C
  • createdAtMillis - 1734453343902
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1868991799567544417827EEF21BEB1D65ED54927B304CE297632423F4E6975802CDCF95B671F71A63C