Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-20 00:46:41 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8A413BEA00B8300D2214A80818A96DE0DCDD58EC2C0150AE979F10655B8A949B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Literature may be literature but when sites which have lost considerable credibility over the past 4 years (ie mainstream media, the CDC, the FDA and the paid 'fact' check sites are quoted, the entire list has that 'rotten to the core' stench about it.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1868902741898125386
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8A413BEA00B8300D2214A80818A96DE0DCDD58EC2C0150AE979F10655B8A949B
  • createdAtMillis - 1734655601897
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18689027418981253868A413BEA00B8300D2214A80818A96DE0DCDD58EC2C0150AE979F10655B8A949B