Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-17 06:38:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 724D13B63D522BCE071C68BAA2561C3D17616527AF70490F22F8F4EB71AA67F5
Participant Details

Original Note:

Literature may be literature but when sites which have lost considerable credibility over the past 4 years (ie mainstream media, the CDC, the FDA and the paid 'fact' check sites are quoted, the entire list has that 'rotten to the core' stench about it.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1868902741898125386
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 724D13B63D522BCE071C68BAA2561C3D17616527AF70490F22F8F4EB71AA67F5
  • createdAtMillis - 1734417509132
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1868902741898125386724D13B63D522BCE071C68BAA2561C3D17616527AF70490F22F8F4EB71AA67F5