Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-17 08:35:41 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 70E0D7FB857B42162823EC7DC3D0FBDFBE00AE16DF77C91A14706088412DCF06
Participant Details

Original Note:

Literature may be literature but when sites which have lost considerable credibility over the past 4 years (ie mainstream media, the CDC, the FDA and the paid 'fact' check sites are quoted, the entire list has that 'rotten to the core' stench about it.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1868902741898125386
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 70E0D7FB857B42162823EC7DC3D0FBDFBE00AE16DF77C91A14706088412DCF06
  • createdAtMillis - 1734424541039
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 186890274189812538670E0D7FB857B42162823EC7DC3D0FBDFBE00AE16DF77C91A14706088412DCF06