Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-17 06:34:36 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1070530A42DCC68AB7A372F31F7242974E178CA2D7F9BE85E55D7D3209E8805A
Participant Details

Original Note:

Literature may be literature but when sites which have lost considerable credibility over the past 4 years (ie mainstream media, the CDC, the FDA and the paid 'fact' check sites are quoted, the entire list has that 'rotten to the core' stench about it.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1868902741898125386
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1070530A42DCC68AB7A372F31F7242974E178CA2D7F9BE85E55D7D3209E8805A
  • createdAtMillis - 1734417276673
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18689027418981253861070530A42DCC68AB7A372F31F7242974E178CA2D7F9BE85E55D7D3209E8805A