Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-17 17:44:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CD5050FF6B14CD898CB9D8AA12CF88BC2124CC48431F7A911F6F9BC31924221E
Participant Details

Original Note:

The letter makes no claim that such a number has been annihilated. It uses figures from other recent conflicts to attempt to predict potential indirect casualties, many of which would happen in the future. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(24)01169-3/fulltext

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1868898012212191661
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CD5050FF6B14CD898CB9D8AA12CF88BC2124CC48431F7A911F6F9BC31924221E
  • createdAtMillis - 1734457449758
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1868898012212191661CD5050FF6B14CD898CB9D8AA12CF88BC2124CC48431F7A911F6F9BC31924221E