Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-18 08:25:38 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 293AE22F8701C637E5A9EEEFF2600FCBD94816FA14ADD3B9BB4FF0F6EC8DF044
Participant Details

Original Note:

まず、こうした研究では性別や基礎疾患等の背景因子を統制しなければ有効性の比較はできません そして背景因子を統制しかつ行方不明者を母集団に含まない施設高齢者を対象にすると3回以上接種者が全死因死亡率が低い事は勿論、2回のみ接種者の死亡リスクの高さも消失する事は既に正式な研究で報告済です https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanwpc/article/PIIS2666-6065(23)00246-8/fulltext 英国でも全く同様に2回のみ接種者の非コロナ死リスクの低さが統計局よりプレプリントで示されてます(下記S図1 https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.06.06.23290982v1.supplementary-material また英国では、この2回目で接種をやめたごく少数者の高死亡率の調査は21年にされベースラインの健康状態が悪かった方が集中した事が報告済です 下記5,図3 https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/bulletins/deathsinvolvingcovid19byvaccinationstatusengland/deathsoccurringbetween1januaryand31october2021

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1868860315334811985
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 293AE22F8701C637E5A9EEEFF2600FCBD94816FA14ADD3B9BB4FF0F6EC8DF044
  • createdAtMillis - 1734510338252
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1868860315334811985293AE22F8701C637E5A9EEEFF2600FCBD94816FA14ADD3B9BB4FF0F6EC8DF044