Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-16 20:47:43 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 49A551CC174A0DBBCDE19711F923C19E72ACD1DFA7417A9D6D857AD626096E74
Participant Details

Original Note:

1. The cited study does not make a definitive claim of causation. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11361252/pdf/nihms-2015690.pdf 2. A Pubpeer comment notes 10 problems with the cited study. https://pubpeer.com/publications/AC3CFEABA70EC0D0AEBD1568368478

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1868753925127426464
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 49A551CC174A0DBBCDE19711F923C19E72ACD1DFA7417A9D6D857AD626096E74
  • createdAtMillis - 1734382063559
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 186875392512742646449A551CC174A0DBBCDE19711F923C19E72ACD1DFA7417A9D6D857AD626096E74