Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-20 04:08:36 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F95F523EAAB303B2E6CDC274AAE8627603890B6B02AA027D7D04665F33156B97
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Australian Financial Review has since amended its headline, and offered an apology to its readers and to energy economist Danny Price, for implying the financial case was dishonest. https://www.afr.com/policy/energy-and-climate/economics-of-coalition-s-nuclear-modelling-are-worth-nothing-20241214-p5kydg https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/defamation https://youtu.be/QL9ok2BfrQc?feature=shared

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1868689008253100241
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F95F523EAAB303B2E6CDC274AAE8627603890B6B02AA027D7D04665F33156B97
  • createdAtMillis - 1734667716294
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1868689008253100241F95F523EAAB303B2E6CDC274AAE8627603890B6B02AA027D7D04665F33156B97