Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-17 02:11:32 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B00FCC62E384783F7E2A83D964D91906D8265CFBF863F8624BBB52F84BBB3150
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Australian Financial Review has since amended its headline, and offered an apology to its readers and to energy economist Danny Price, for implying the financial case was dishonest. https://www.afr.com/policy/energy-and-climate/economics-of-coalition-s-nuclear-modelling-are-worth-nothing-20241214-p5kydg https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/defamation https://youtu.be/QL9ok2BfrQc?feature=shared

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1868689008253100241
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B00FCC62E384783F7E2A83D964D91906D8265CFBF863F8624BBB52F84BBB3150
  • createdAtMillis - 1734401492824
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1868689008253100241B00FCC62E384783F7E2A83D964D91906D8265CFBF863F8624BBB52F84BBB3150