Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-19 18:20:11 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6A32A6F7846C75409C4813B6FBFF3C7620D51CB369A892348644769FE8C37EF2
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Australian Financial Review has since amended its headline, and offered an apology to its readers and to energy economist Danny Price, for implying the financial case was dishonest. https://www.afr.com/policy/energy-and-climate/economics-of-coalition-s-nuclear-modelling-are-worth-nothing-20241214-p5kydg https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/defamation https://youtu.be/QL9ok2BfrQc?feature=shared

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1868689008253100241
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6A32A6F7846C75409C4813B6FBFF3C7620D51CB369A892348644769FE8C37EF2
  • createdAtMillis - 1734632411642
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 18686890082531002416A32A6F7846C75409C4813B6FBFF3C7620D51CB369A892348644769FE8C37EF2