Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-16 16:51:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4C8AC571B79CA160167758413A082F83A204C4E7CDC78235B981225FBC5594F9
Participant Details

Original Note:

Dans cette lettre, il n’y a aucune preuve qui pourrait nous dire que cette lettre a été rédigé par un électeur du RN, il s’agit d’ici d’une spéculation https://www.larousse.fr/dictionnaires/francais/sp%C3%A9culation/74117

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1868673462111260762
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4C8AC571B79CA160167758413A082F83A204C4E7CDC78235B981225FBC5594F9
  • createdAtMillis - 1734367861717
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18686734621112607624C8AC571B79CA160167758413A082F83A204C4E7CDC78235B981225FBC5594F9