Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-16 04:43:19 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 25B3601BE833DC001FDEB9C11C8166A2A47EC8A81BA883EB98CB43926792AD94
Participant Details

Original Note:

O autor do post desinforma ao não mencionar que na época da prisão, a jurisprudência permitia a prisão após o julgamento em segunda instância. Conforme visto na negativa acerca do HC de Lula sobre o caso nos votos do ministro Fachin(1) e Rosa Weber(2) (1)https://x.com/STF_oficial/status/981583569394065408 (2)https://x.com/STF_oficial/status/981661120330194944

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1868468745431093657
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 25B3601BE833DC001FDEB9C11C8166A2A47EC8A81BA883EB98CB43926792AD94
  • createdAtMillis - 1734324199855
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 186846874543109365725B3601BE833DC001FDEB9C11C8166A2A47EC8A81BA883EB98CB43926792AD94