Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-17 01:25:20 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 60D1066299BCBC0DA7EA948C47D29201A12851CF4D7D5684514501DF662D9471
Participant Details

Original Note:

Apenas uma opinião abertamente expressa. Além disso, o judiciário pode discutir sobre cada caso para aplicar a lei, como no exemplo de fonte abaixo, em que crimes foram cometidos e mesmo assim a prisão preventiva foi revogada. Ou seja, existe o direito a críticas. https://noticias.uol.com.br/ultimas-noticias/agencia-estado/2017/12/01/pela-terceira-vez-gilmar-mendes-manda-soltar-empresario-jacob-barata-filho.htm

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1868426713031491973
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 60D1066299BCBC0DA7EA948C47D29201A12851CF4D7D5684514501DF662D9471
  • createdAtMillis - 1734398720121
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 186842671303149197360D1066299BCBC0DA7EA948C47D29201A12851CF4D7D5684514501DF662D9471