Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-15 17:01:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F788D013248968F481B896B0D25B8B978D845B18E6AF4FDA451BAE8FC64BDAFC
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The Community Notes perfectly make the original post's point - that "science" is not an oracle to be "trusted", but assertions based on evidence and reasoning that can and should be challenged where appropriate. "Trust the science" is always wrong.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1868340266492383603
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F788D013248968F481B896B0D25B8B978D845B18E6AF4FDA451BAE8FC64BDAFC
  • createdAtMillis - 1734282107357
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1868340266492383603F788D013248968F481B896B0D25B8B978D845B18E6AF4FDA451BAE8FC64BDAFC