Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-16 11:52:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C849FE3A18BF3B4E39F9A1ECBF2F63724AE11F94AB161D88DC52293BBB09B3D0
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The Community Notes perfectly make the original post's point - that "science" is not an oracle to be "trusted", but assertions based on evidence and reasoning that can and should be challenged where appropriate. "Trust the science" is always wrong.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1868340266492383603
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C849FE3A18BF3B4E39F9A1ECBF2F63724AE11F94AB161D88DC52293BBB09B3D0
  • createdAtMillis - 1734349965175
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1868340266492383603C849FE3A18BF3B4E39F9A1ECBF2F63724AE11F94AB161D88DC52293BBB09B3D0