Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-15 18:18:03 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A00CF048C2D5F6BEE20588FF23E0D1F21B8E5E282459AD6E1501E43EC1FB7242
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The Community Notes perfectly make the original post's point - that "science" is not an oracle to be "trusted", but assertions based on evidence and reasoning that can and should be challenged where appropriate. "Trust the science" is always wrong.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1868340266492383603
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A00CF048C2D5F6BEE20588FF23E0D1F21B8E5E282459AD6E1501E43EC1FB7242
  • createdAtMillis - 1734286683161
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1868340266492383603A00CF048C2D5F6BEE20588FF23E0D1F21B8E5E282459AD6E1501E43EC1FB7242