Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-15 23:17:49 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 463AE9446003AE4D0CC0C326D4A80CA8CE21CDD4F84BFC5BA173CC92F453E562
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The Community Notes perfectly make the original post's point - that "science" is not an oracle to be "trusted", but assertions based on evidence and reasoning that can and should be challenged where appropriate. "Trust the science" is always wrong.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1868340266492383603
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 463AE9446003AE4D0CC0C326D4A80CA8CE21CDD4F84BFC5BA173CC92F453E562
  • createdAtMillis - 1734304669617
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1868340266492383603463AE9446003AE4D0CC0C326D4A80CA8CE21CDD4F84BFC5BA173CC92F453E562