Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-16 01:37:41 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 222C798DF07B86F1322010F3D85D12F466D2352242CE110A0E1728A40F3569FC
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The Community Notes perfectly make the original post's point - that "science" is not an oracle to be "trusted", but assertions based on evidence and reasoning that can and should be challenged where appropriate. "Trust the science" is always wrong.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1868340266492383603
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 222C798DF07B86F1322010F3D85D12F466D2352242CE110A0E1728A40F3569FC
  • createdAtMillis - 1734313061835
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1868340266492383603222C798DF07B86F1322010F3D85D12F466D2352242CE110A0E1728A40F3569FC