Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-16 15:11:08 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C571A0F993FDB60AEE1628F5253199697C68EBAFDC15B4E70393A0CAE0409E64
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The post is criticizing the lack of beauty as criteria. The fact that they're not evaluating beauty, as the note points out, is literally the point.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1868292456015389099
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C571A0F993FDB60AEE1628F5253199697C68EBAFDC15B4E70393A0CAE0409E64
  • createdAtMillis - 1734361868682
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1868292456015389099C571A0F993FDB60AEE1628F5253199697C68EBAFDC15B4E70393A0CAE0409E64