Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-16 20:21:44 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A7F72E1AB1D6AF9910C0E2C559A05B008D1C8E1FD22BEBD90BC3766387B68A5E
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The post is criticizing the lack of beauty as criteria. The fact that they're not evaluating beauty, as the note points out, is literally the point.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1868292456015389099
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A7F72E1AB1D6AF9910C0E2C559A05B008D1C8E1FD22BEBD90BC3766387B68A5E
  • createdAtMillis - 1734380504986
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1868292456015389099A7F72E1AB1D6AF9910C0E2C559A05B008D1C8E1FD22BEBD90BC3766387B68A5E