Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-16 19:47:03 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4CE284A70254D19C7994A0C577621C475FE97BC48A7B9D961C4B92798DB5D0F6
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The post is criticizing the lack of beauty as criteria. The fact that they're not evaluating beauty, as the note points out, is literally the point.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1868292456015389099
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4CE284A70254D19C7994A0C577621C475FE97BC48A7B9D961C4B92798DB5D0F6
  • createdAtMillis - 1734378423767
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18682924560153890994CE284A70254D19C7994A0C577621C475FE97BC48A7B9D961C4B92798DB5D0F6