Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-16 21:17:01 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 46248D3E2FBAC030BDAC31510BF7035065023930CC6727DA399036F8ECB851F1
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The post is criticizing the lack of beauty as criteria. The fact that they're not evaluating beauty, as the note points out, is literally the point.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1868292456015389099
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 46248D3E2FBAC030BDAC31510BF7035065023930CC6727DA399036F8ECB851F1
  • createdAtMillis - 1734383821548
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 186829245601538909946248D3E2FBAC030BDAC31510BF7035065023930CC6727DA399036F8ECB851F1