Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-16 17:43:23 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3089B59EECFD901ACB02B6DAA690487A592D5DF3114EEFCB89775C6CF905562D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The post is criticizing the lack of beauty as criteria. The fact that they're not evaluating beauty, as the note points out, is literally the point.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1868292456015389099
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3089B59EECFD901ACB02B6DAA690487A592D5DF3114EEFCB89775C6CF905562D
  • createdAtMillis - 1734371003330
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18682924560153890993089B59EECFD901ACB02B6DAA690487A592D5DF3114EEFCB89775C6CF905562D