Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-15 22:08:21 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C1129A5FDD8C1DD18C1E820D8FA9B17FBBCD4AD7E572CB6E3338023C1AF759D6
Participant Details

Original Note:

Innonence presumption exists, until J&J is found guilty, or there is enough evidence to support that they had knowledge of the benzene the note is misleading. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/presumption_of_innocence

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1868139037506088973
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C1129A5FDD8C1DD18C1E820D8FA9B17FBBCD4AD7E572CB6E3338023C1AF759D6
  • createdAtMillis - 1734300501412
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1868139037506088973C1129A5FDD8C1DD18C1E820D8FA9B17FBBCD4AD7E572CB6E3338023C1AF759D6