Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-15 06:00:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1FEC05A8C073035EB25A8F001AEEB024D9265379254A8A63A86C20C2F25C1FC8
Participant Details

Original Note:

Innonence presumption exists, until J&J is found guilty, or there is enough evidence to support that they had knowledge of the benzene the note is misleading. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/presumption_of_innocence

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1868139037506088973
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1FEC05A8C073035EB25A8F001AEEB024D9265379254A8A63A86C20C2F25C1FC8
  • createdAtMillis - 1734242434108
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18681390375060889731FEC05A8C073035EB25A8F001AEEB024D9265379254A8A63A86C20C2F25C1FC8